[Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.orgWed Nov 23 00:05:58 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:58:25PM -0500, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> > I have a HA NFS server in the rack (dual mini-ITX with a 300 GB
> > drive each) which are kept in sync via DRBD. Bonnie++ said something
> > about 2-3 MByte/s, so mini-ITX are quite underpowered for the application.
>
> That seems like awful disk performance. But, why would that have
Oh, yes.
> anything to do per-se with is being a mini-ITX motherboard? If its
The onboard NICs are 100 MBit/s (that would cap performance
at 8-9 MByte/s, as drbd uses just eth1), and the CPU quite underpowered.
Plus, there's NFS overhead. If I run bonnie++ locally (iozone seems de
rigeur now though) it reports
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
boron 1G 5450 80 12239 11 9052 16 7291 95 41852 33 192.6 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 917 53 +++++ +++ 1133 47 979 59 +++++ +++ 851 43
boron,1G,5450,80,12239,11,9052,16,7291,95,41852,33,192.6,1,16,917,53,+++++,+++,1133,47,979,59,+++++,+++,851,43
> PCI and IDE chipsets are ok, and Linux recognizes them correctly, then
> the disk should work just as well as on a larger motherboard, right?
> Did you use the hdparm -i -I -tT options to check that Linux isn't
> putting the disk controller into the wrong mode?
Looks arguably sensible to me:
Model=Maxtor 5A300J0, FwRev=RAM51VV0, SerialNo=A81ARWXE
Config={ Fixed }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=57
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=off
CurCHS=65535/1/63, CurSects=4128705, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255) WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: (null):
* signifies the current active mode
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: Maxtor 5A300J0
Serial Number: A81ARWXE
Firmware Revision: RAM51VV0
Standards:
Supported: 7 6 5 4
Likely used: 7
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 65535
heads 16 1
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 4128705
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 585940320
device size with M = 1024*1024: 286103 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 300001 MBytes (300 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Queue depth: 1
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 0
Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0000)
Recommended acoustic management value: 192, current value: 254
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* NOP cmd
* READ BUFFER cmd
* WRITE BUFFER cmd
* Host Protected Area feature set
* Look-ahead
* Write cache
* Power Management feature set
* SMART feature set
* FLUSH CACHE EXT command
* Mandatory FLUSH CACHE command
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
* 48-bit Address feature set
* Automatic Acoustic Management feature set
SET MAX security extension
Advanced Power Management feature set
* DOWNLOAD MICROCODE cmd
* SMART self-test
* SMART error logging
HW reset results:
CBLID- above Vih
Device num = 0 determined by CSEL
Checksum: correct
Timing cached reads: 596 MB in 2.01 seconds = 295.97 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 100 MB in 3.01 seconds = 33.21 MB/sec
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20051123/45e7ccd4/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
