[Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSat Dec 9 15:44:25 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> I would hazard that any DHCP/PXE type install server would struggle with >> 2000 requests a single server (implying 1 gb nic?) might have trouble with the tftp part, but I don't see why you couldn't scale up by splitting the tftp part off to multiple servers. I'd expect a single DHCP (no TFTP) would be plenty in all cases. 100 tftp clients per server would probably be pretty safe. I personally like the idea of putting one admin server in each rack. they don't have to be fancy servers, by any means. > There are a few modifications you have to make to increase the number of bootps before > it fails. do you mean you'd expect load problems even with a single sever dedicated only to dhcp? > So now to figure out my next step. I will need local space for logs and data/temp data files. why would you want logs local?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
