[Beowulf] Big storage
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comMon Aug 27 12:30:51 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Next message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:25:51AM -0500, Bruce Allen wrote: > I did read Garth's comments. I believe that there are two types of > possible problems: > > (1) A sector or handful of sectors on a disk become unreadable > (2) An entire disk fails (all sectors become unreadable) > > Problems of type (1) can be handled well by high quality raid > implementations. I believe Garth's whole point is that your assumption above is often NOT true. He also seemed to imply that this is a function of the ineraction between the block-level RAID implementation and the file system, as his Panasas file system reputedly fixes this scary, "one small unrecoverable read during array rebuild kills your entire disk volume" failure mode. However, I do not really understand exactly which systems are subject to this risk of catastrophic failure and which are not, nor why. If anyone has pointers to a more complete explanation, please do chime in... -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Next message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
