[Beowulf] 64-bit AMD Opteron with 32-bit Intel Xeon possible?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jeramy Ashlock Jeramy.Ashlock at Colorado.EDUWed Aug 29 18:31:01 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Configuration change monitoring
- Next message: [Beowulf] 64-bit AMD Opteron with 32-bit Intel Xeon possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello, I'm a newbie to Beowulf clusters and mpi, and I'm a little confused as to how to proceed because I don't have a standard homogeneous cluster. I'm reading the Introduction to MPI from the PACS group and "Beowulf cluster computing with Linux" by Gropp et al. to learn how to later parallelize my code, but I'm trying to get MPI up and running at the same time. For now I have only 2 dual-processor (smp) machines from ASL that I am trying to get working together with a fortran 90 code that includes the LAPACK solver ZGESVX. One machine has 32-bit Xeons, the other has 64-bit Opterons. To complicate things even more, I have a Lahey f95 compiler on the 32-bit machine using the Intel MKL for the solver routine, and a PGI f95 compiler on the 64-bit machine using the ACML for the solver routine. I tried to get mpich2 working, but couldn't get the ring to work with my iptables, and mpich1 is recommended for heterogeneous clusters anyways. I know LAM-MPI is designed for heterogeneous clusters, and mpich1 has some 64-bit issues with the PGI compiler (see http://www.pgroup.com/resources/mpich/mpich126_pgi60.htm), but PGI does not support debugging with LAM-MPI. So for now, I'm trying to get MPICH1 working and I will try LAM-MPI later. Now, If I first install PGI's portabliity library on the Xeon machine and I use MKL rather than ACML for the solver, I can then use the 64-bit compiler to create a 32-bit executable that will run on both the Opteron and Xeon machines. My questions are: 1.) Is it recommended to compile a single executable that will run on both machines as I have done, or is it easy to allow different executables (i.e. make a 64bit executable for the Opteron machine)? 2.) When installing MPICH1, should I configure/make/make install separately on both machines, or will I end up with library incompatibilities because of the 32 vs. 64bit architectures? Should I just install MPICH1 on one machine and copy over the resulting directory tree /usr/local/mpich? sorry for the ugly mess and thanks in advance for any assistance you can give.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Configuration change monitoring
- Next message: [Beowulf] 64-bit AMD Opteron with 32-bit Intel Xeon possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
