[Beowulf] how green is that?!?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
richard.walsh at comcast.net richard.walsh at comcast.netThu Dec 20 07:38:09 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] how green is that?!?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: how green is that?!?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-------------- Original message -------------- From: Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> > http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=312084283 > > very amusing and effective stunt for SiCortex! though I wonder > whether the total carbon footprint winds up being bigger than when > using conventional power (ie, that the human+foodchain system is > itself fairly high-carbon...) > Right. Maybe running of a bunch of photo-voltaics would have been more hydrocarbon friendly (if not market grabbing), but the machine is more peak-efficient (there is little benchmark data out there) per watt than Blue Gene by my calculation, more balanced than Opteron (not than a Cray), and has a very cool custom interconnect. It takes some baby steps in the direction of "many-core" with more and simpler cores than the current generation of x86-64 chips. If it is possible for custom machines to regain traction in this space, I think SiCortex's systems are the best bet. Regards, rbw -- "Making predictions is hard, especially about the future." Niels Bohr -- Richard Walsh Thrashing River Consulting-- 5605 Alameda St. Shoreview, MN 55126 Phone #: 612-382-4620 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20071220/c3a073ef/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] how green is that?!?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: how green is that?!?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
