[Beowulf] cold cathode fluorescent backlighting
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.comThu Jun 28 17:14:39 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cold cathode fluorescent backlighting
- Next message: [Beowulf] cold cathode fluorescent backlighting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: > So yes, I think that LCDs are, on average, far better for the planet and > your pocketbook than CRTs (remember, an 80W power differential can add > up to $100's in power savings over the lifetime of a monitor), but not > perfect. LEDs, if/when they ever appear (Cree, are you listening?) > would almost certainly be better than either in all ways. led backlit displays are already commercially available (for a year or more in some case like cellphone and high-end lcd tv), with the new mac be a notable but not first example in a laptop. As lumens/watt continues to increase their advantages over ccfl's will continue to grow... At the same time direct emissive displays (oled) will eventually challenge lcd in most areas where lcd currently challenges other technology. > rgb > >> >> Wikipedia is a good source of keywords for use in further research. I >> would not consider Wikipedia an authoritative source of information on >> it's own. >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cold cathode fluorescent backlighting
- Next message: [Beowulf] cold cathode fluorescent backlighting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
