[Beowulf] network filesystem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Stu Midgley sdm900 at gmail.comMon Mar 5 01:20:55 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'd strongly recommend Lustre. It will work perfectly well from a single server node and give much higher bandwidths than NFS. If you have two nic's you can also serve up the file system over both and see around 150MB/s total bandwidth. Also, if you need more storage in the future, you can just add more servers... and get linear scaling of bandwidth. Stu. On 3/1/07, jaime.perea at gmail.com <jaime.perea at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a small (16 dual xeon machines) cluster. We are going to add > an additional machine which is only going to serve a big filesystem via > a gigabit interface. > > Does anybody knows what is better for a cluster of this size, exporting the > filesystem via NFS or use another alternative such as a cluster filesystem > like GFS or OCFS? > > Thanks in advance > > -- > > Jaime D. Perea Duarte. <jaime at iaa dot es> > Linux registered user #10472 > > Dep. Astrofisica Extragalactica. > Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC) > Apdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain. > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Dr Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
