[Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Mar 8 10:00:03 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Poweredge 1435SC >> Dual Core AMD Opteron 2216 2.4GHz >> 3GB RAM 667MHz, 2x512MB and 2x1GB Single Ranked DIMMs >> >> Poweredge 1950 >> Dual Core Intel Xeon 5130 2.0Ghz >> 2GB 533MHz (4x512MB), Single Ranked DIMMs in general, the opteron will probably have an advantage for memory-intensive codes; the core2 starts out with larger per-core cache and double the fp-SSE throughput, so will probably win for cache-friendly, SSE-able FP-intense codes. as usual, AMD and Intel are out-of-phase in product generations, so this is basically a semi-old AMD chip versus an Intel chip designed specifically to beat the AMD chip ;) > Here are some benchmarks I did on similar (though non-Dell) systems: > > http://www.duke.edu/~jlb17/optxeon.pdf with wild handwaves, I think this data supports my generalizations: the core2 is an excellent chip which starts out faster, but tends not to scale as well as memory load or nthreads increases. that's what you'd expect from the generational difference, larger cache, poorer memory infrastructure. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
