[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSun May 11 13:45:46 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karen Shaeffer wrote: > Hi Joel, > Yes, but a separate and distinct power distribution for that +5 volt > supply will then need to be implemented on the system board to support > a full IPMI implementation residing on the system board. That was my > point. You are confusing power source with implemented PCB power > distribution. Hi Karen I haven't seen IPMI cards that get their power from any other place than the motherboard slot. There may be some that have a separate supply, but I haven't run across them. That is, as long as the power supply is "on", the main system power does not need to be, and the IPMI is powered over a similar bus to that which powers the motherboard network cards. I don't think Joel was confused on this. Joe -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
