[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N dnlombar at ichips.intel.comTue May 13 07:59:54 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 08:53:12PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> writes: > > I find that with IPMI and console redirection, it's very rarely necessary to > > care about where your nodes are, at least from a sysadmin perspective. > > Speaking of IPMI, are there reasonable motherboards that incorporate > it right into the design at this point, or is it still mostly an add > on? Well, clearly the answer is It Depends. But, Intel's server boards usually do, e.g., S5000XAL, S5000PAL, et al. -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
