[Beowulf] Computation on the head node
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Vlad Manea vlad at geociencias.unam.mxSat May 17 13:41:21 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Next message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks Perry, I would probably go with a separate file server. I have seen a lot of NAS on the market recently (i.e. Netgear ReadyNAS NV+ 4Tb X-RAID) and I am wandering if they might be a good/bad choice (the price is appealing...). On the other hand I do not want to see all may cluster idle waiting for the file server. The w/r rate transfer for these NAS is ~30-40 MB/sec which probably is a modest one. Do you have any recommendations for the file server? I think I need lots of RAM and fast disks. Since SCSI are expensive, are SATA disks OK? Also, can I take the advantage of multiple LAN ports on the file server? (I see the Dell PowerEdge SC1435 can handle 4 NICs for example.) Since all my machines are from DELL maybe I can get a discount from them if I would go buying one file server. Thanks, Vlad Perry E. Metzger wrote: > Vlad Manea <vlad at geociencias.unam.mx> writes: > >> I have a question regarding the head node for a small cluster that I >> would like to build: >> >> which are the disadvantages of using the head node as a computation >> node? Since I plan to have NFS on it, I guess there will be >> problems with comunication which probably will slow down the whole >> cluster, but I am not sure since this is my first attempt to built >> one... >> > > As is always the case, "it depends". Your computational load might be > such that doing computation on the head speeds up the overall > computation by adding a needed CPU, or might be such that it slows it > down by robbing the whole cluster of needed file i/o performance. That > depends enormously on the particular task you're doing. The only real > way to know is to test it and see what happens. > > In general, if you have enough machines, I don't think there is much > point in doing computation on the head -- it complicates matters and > if you have enough machines you're only adding a tiny percentage of > extra CPU -- but if you have a very small cluster and you need the > extra CPU and your tests say it is fine, then go for it. You'll have > to test to be sure. > > Perry > -- *Dr. Vlad Constantin Manea* *Professor of Geophysics* Computational Geodynamics Lab. <http://www.geociencias.unam.mx/geodinamica> Centro de Geociencias, Campus UNAM, Juriquilla, Blvd Juriquilla 3001, Juriquilla, Querétaro, 76230, México. phone: +52 55 5623 4104/ext.133 fax: (55) 5623-4129 http://www.geociencias.unam.mx/geodinamica -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080517/370ce751/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Next message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
